中国高考评价体系包含“一核”“四层”“四 翼”。其中,“四层”指查考践诺，即中枢价值、学科 修养、重要才气、必备学问,是训诫西席方针在高登第的提真金不怕火，复兴了“考什么”的问题。重要才气是学生在靠近与学科有关的糊话柄践或学习探索问题情境时，有用地意志问题、分析问题、惩办问题所必须具备的才气。高考英语科的重要才气包 括听力领路、阅读领路、书面抒发和白话抒发等。“2023英语新高考I卷”凸起了对上述重要才气的查考。本文仅以其中的阅读题为例，分析阅读领路 重要才气的体现。

图片

一、聚焦阅读领路重要才气的试题分析 西席部锻练中心助理揣度员陈康等东谈主将英语科的阅读领路才气归纳为七项，隔离为：领路词汇；领路具体信息；领路主旨要义；领路不雅点、格调；领路方针；推断；领路著述结构、类型。以下调和试题，共享求教新高考I卷对这七项阅读才气的查考。（一）领路词汇 新高考I卷对词汇的条款，除了惯例的“领路惯例中枢词”除外，我认为它还在以下两个方面有所条款：    1、尽可能径直领路派生词纵不雅统统这个词阅读领路部分的4个语篇，咱们不错发现好多的派生词，这里以C篇为例，有教师统计如下：全文共299词，文本中出现课标词的合成词、派生词或调度词共13个，课标未收录词1个，declutter。这里：聘任性必修阶段掌抓的词汇（用**标志），共12个。

序号

课标词试题用词1minimumminimalism/minimalist2detaildetailed3exploreexploration4philosophy**philosophy/philosophical5examineexamination6tolerateintolerable7optionoptional8participate**participants9sustain**sustainable**10necessarynecessity11mindmindless12tooltoolbox13lifelifestyle（该表格引自：公众号“爱疯英语”06-14这天罗厚健安分著述）由此可看到：命题东谈主并未将派生词动作生词。对派生词的领路，是学生必须要具备的识词才气。2、尽可能的从荆棘文来领路超纲词这一条款，常被化妆为“词汇揣度题”出现。2023新高考I卷中也体现这一条款。举例：C篇的29题即是需要学生揣度declutter这一超纲词。事实上，尽管该词是超纲词，可是依据下文以及给定谜底选项，咱们不难猜出其正确含义。底下是declutter的荆棘文以及给定的备选项。Part one concludes by introducing my suggested method for adopting this philosophy: the digital declutter. This process requires you to step away from optional online activities for thirty years.29. What does the underlined word “declutter” in paragraph 3 mean?A. Clear-up.   B. Add-on.  C. Check-in. D. Take-over.（二） 领路具体信息 这一重要才气条款考生应能从语科中索取诸如数字、本事、处所、东谈主物、事件及行动的缘由、经由、神气、成果等细节信息，并巧合领路办法性信息。这些信息有的不错径直从文中赢得，有的需要进行简便归纳。对具体信息的查考，时常以“细节领路”题出现，但正如上文所言，这种领路，有时咱们不错径直索取，有时需要归纳详细。这里举一个“需要归纳详细”的例子：C篇的30题：In the final chapter of part one, I’ll guide you through carrying out your own digital declutter. In doing so, I’ll draw on an experiment I ran in 2018 in which over 1,600 people agreed to perform a digital declutter. You’ll hear these participants’ stories and learn what strategies worked well for them, and what traps they encountered that you should avoid.【30】What is presented in the final chapter of part one?A.Theoretical models.   B. Statistical methods. C.Practical examples.   D. Historical analyses（三） 领路主旨要义 每篇著述致使每个段落齐有主旨要义。考生应能识别或归来详细著述或段落的主旨要义。举例D篇的32题：This effect capitalizes on the fact that when people make errors, those errors aren’t always the same. Some people will tend to overestimate, and some to underestimate. When enough of these errors are averaged together, they cancel each other out, resulting in a more accurate estimate. If people are similar and tend to make the same errors, then their errors won’t cancel each other out. In more technical terms, the wisdom of crowds requires that people’s estimates be independent. If for whatever reasons, people’s errors become correlated or dependent, the accuracy of the estimate will go down.【32】 What is paragraph 2 of the text mainly about?  A. The methods of estimation.   B. The underlying logic of the effect.  C.The causes of people’s errors.   D. The design of Galton’s experiment.（四） 领路不雅点、格调 这一重要才气条款考生除了领路语篇径直表述的不雅点、格调，还要能分析领路隐含的不雅点、格调。 举例C篇的第31题，有关文段如下：The second part of this book takes a closer look at some ideas that will help you cultivate (培养) a sustainable digital minimalism lifestyle. In these chapters, I examine issues such as the importance of solitude (落寞) and the necessity of cultivating high-quality leisure to replace the time most now spend on mindless device use. Each chapter concludes with a collection of practices, which are designed to help you act on the big ideas of the chapter. You can view these practices as a toolbox meant to aid your efforts to build a minimalist lifestyle that words for your particular circumstances.【31】What does the author suggest readers do with the practices offered in part two?A. Use them as needed. B. Recommend them to friends.C. Evaluate their effects. D. Identify the ideas behind them.再如D篇的第35题，径直问作家格调：In a follow-up study with 100 university students, the researchers tried to get a better sense of what the group members actually did in their discussion. Did they tend to go with those most confident about their estimates? Did they follow those least willing to change their minds? This happened some of the time, but it wasn’t the dominant response. Most frequently, the groups reported that they “shared arguments and reasoned together.” Somehow, these arguments and reasoning resulted in a global reduction in error. Although the studies led by Navajas have limitations and many questions remain，the potential implications for group discussion and decision-making are enormous.35. What is the author’s attitude toward Navajas’ studies?      A. Unclear.         B. Dismissive.          C. Doubtful.       D. Approving.（五） 领路方针 阅读语篇频频通过多种神气抒发写稿方针。考生不但措施路作家径直抒发的方针，也要分析领路作家未径直抒发的方针。如阅读领路B篇的26题。Over the years, John has taken on many big jobs. He developed a greenhouse-like facility that treated sewage (浑水) from 1,600 homes in South Burlington. He also designed an eco-machine to clean canal water in Fuzhou, a city in southeast China.26. What is the author’s purpose in mentioning Fuzhou?A. To review John’s research plans.   B. To show an application of John’s idea.C. To compare John’s different jobs.   D. To erase doubts about John’s invention.（六） 推断 这一重要才气条款考生字据著述所提供的信息进行推理,如推断作家未明确阐扬的事件或行动的原因、经由、成果，推断东谈主物或事物的特色，推断东谈主物的心计或口吻等。    新高考I卷中阅读领路部分中好多题齐需要推断。举例D篇34题：In a follow-up study with 100 university students, the researchers tried to get a better sense of what the group members actually did in their discussion. Did they tend to go with those most confident about their estimates? Did they follow those least willing to change their minds? This happened some of the time, but it wasn’t the dominant response. Most frequently, the groups reported that they “shared arguments and reasoned together.” Somehow, these arguments and reasoning resulted in a global reduction in error. Although the studies led by Navajas have limitations and many questions remain，the potential implications for group discussion and decision-making are enormous.34. What did the follow-up study focus on?A. The size of the groups.  B. The dominant members.C. The discussion process.  D. The individual estimates.（七）领路著述结构、类型 这一重要才气是指考生能支配语篇学问，鉴识不同著述文学，领路著述里面逻辑相关和作家为使行文连贯使用的多样连结办段。本次高登第莫得触及该方面的问题。二、培养阅读领路重要才气的教学启示 阅读领路是学习和使用英语的一项基本才气。培养阅读领路重要才气，教学需要作念到以下几个方面： （一）扎根语篇，深度教学在现时新高考的期间布景下，教师的教学要作念到：以语篇为中心，以词汇和语法为两个基本点。即：以商酌主题意念念为主要任务，在完成这一主要任务的同期，惩办“识别词汇”与“了解语法”的问题。我常合计这么的“词汇与语法的教学”即是：逢山开道，遇水架桥。

    （未完待续）

参考文件：

陈康，吴泓霖,李新煜，等.基于高考评价体系的英语科锻练践诺校正奉行旅途[J].中国锻练,2019(12):33-37.

本站仅提供存储事业，统统践诺均由用户发布，如发现存害或侵权践诺，请点击举报。